Claims position

Say only what the evidence can support.

GCCAP reports observed temperature behaviour, data quality and evidence limitations. It does not certify food safety, declare legal compliance or publish private pilot performance without governance controls.

View Evidence Model ›Request Walkthrough ›

CLAIM BOUNDARYEvery public claim must be evidence-backed, specific, limited and clear about what GCCAP can and cannot prove.

CLAIMS CONTROL VIEWREPORT-SAFE

AllowedObserved behaviour

AllowedData-quality limits

BlockedFood-safety certification

BlockedLegal breach finding

Report observed behaviour.Use language tied to actual readings, timestamps, journey stages, device health and evidence limits.

State the limits.Every report should explain what was observed, what was missing and what cannot be concluded.

Block overclaiming.Avoid certified, compliant, safe, unsafe, legal finding or guaranteed-performance language.

Protect private data.Client-specific pilot results stay private unless separately approved through governance controls.

Operating logic

The legal strength comes from restraint.

GCCAP becomes more credible by being precise, conservative and evidence-led. The claim boundary protects clients, protects GCCAP and makes future Watchdog authority more defensible.

Observed behaviour, not safety certificationEvidence support, not legal adviceBenchmark method, not public accusationPrivate reports, not uncontrolled publication

Keep the evidence position clean.

Use the claims boundary as the public rulebook for every page, report and Watchdog output.

View Evidence ›Contact GCCAP ›