GCCAPCold chain. Clear evidence. Confidence.

Airline catering evidence authority

The evidence standard for airline catering cold-chain accountability.

GCCAP records, reconstructs and reports cart-level cold-chain evidence across the airline catering journey so caterers, airlines, insurers and auditors can understand what happened, when it happened and what evidence exists.

View sample reports ›Explore incidents ›
PUBLIC AUTHORITYRepresentative examples only. Live client evidence appears after approved hardware validation, site access and governance controls.
GROUND LEG EVIDENCE VIEWPUBLIC AUTHORITY
Ground leg evidence view from catering cart through truck and aircraft handover
For caterers
Prove process behaviour, reduce disputes and make review-ready evidence easier to produce.
For airlines
See supplier evidence linked to cart, route, stage and handover context.
For insurers
Review complete timelines, retained source records and clear limitation statements.
For client confidence
Create governed accountability without exposing private client operations.

The cart-to-evidence operating spine

GCCAP pipeline from cart signal to gateway, evidence report and governed Export gate

Evidence standard

What GCCAP means by evidence

A temperature number is not enough. GCCAP evidence connects the observation to operational context and report-safe interpretation.

Cart and journey identityCart, site, stage, dispatch, flight/route context and handover window where available.
Timestamp truthSensor measurement time, retrieval time, GCCAP receipt time and report generation time are separated.
Exception intelligenceThe report identifies stage, duration, severity, evidence confidence and review boundary.
Retained source recordRaw source records are preserved internally so reports can be reviewed without relying on memory.

Governance

Public authority boundaries

GCCAP builds trust by being precise about what its evidence can and cannot claim.

  1. 01

    GCCAP supports audit, insurer, incident and food-safety review; it does not certify legal compliance.

  2. 02

    Representative pages and reports are labelled until live governed deployments exist.

  3. 03

    Private client reports stay separate from public education and public communication material.

  4. 04

    Supplier, firmware, parser and device-stack details remain internal.

  5. 05

    Public incident content uses source-based neutral wording and avoids unsupported blame.

See the evidence layer before the trial.

Review the representative report library, then request a controlled pilot walkthrough when your team is ready.

View sample reports ›Request walkthrough ›