Temperature Evidence vs Traceability Brief
Shareable one-page PDF explaining the difference between lot tracing, catering ERP, sensors and GCCAP temperature evidence.
DownloadTemperature evidence vs traceability
Traceability tells where food went. GCCAP shows what happened to cart temperature.
GCCAP separates temperature evidence from lot-code traceability, catering ERP and generic sensor monitoring. The focus is narrow: sealed cart-level temperature evidence across the airline catering ground leg, aligned to existing food-safety expectations and careful claims language.
PUBLIC-SAFE POSITIONINGThis page educates. It does not claim GCCAP is legally mandatory, certify compliance, determine liability or disclose hardware details.
GCCAP EVIDENCE VIEWPUBLIC-SAFE POSITIONING
Download library
Review-ready GCCAP resources
These assets help airline, caterer, auditor, insurer and procurement teams understand the evidence model before a pilot walkthrough.
Evidence standard
The buyer distinction
Every page, file and message should make this distinction simple.
Traceability questionWhich food lot moved from origin to destination, and how fast can it be recalled?
Temperature evidence questionWhat happened to the cart temperature during cold-hold release, staging, transport, tarmac hold and handover?
GCCAP outputTimestamped temperature records, journey-stage reconstruction, exceptions, confidence and evidence pack.
Buyer valueAudit support, incident review, insurer review and airline supplier assurance.
Public boundaryGCCAP supports evidence review; it does not certify compliance or determine liability.
Use the brief to create shared understanding.
Use this page to compare GCCAP with traceability, ERP and generic monitoring, then review the checklist pack or start a controlled pilot conversation.